Two Ideas to Improve Contact Center Recruiting -

Success story after success story have supported the use of pre-employment assessments to improve the quality of hire for contact centers. However, using pre employment assessment tools is just part of the overall recruiting process. The reality of high volume agent selection systems is that the use of valid assessment tools is only part of an effective recruiting process.  

 

What can be done to improve the frontline agent recruiting process? 

 

In this article, we will highlight two strategies that effective contact center hiring programs are using. In our experience working with leading contact centers, successful staffing programs have the right ratio of recruiters to hiring volume and focus on sourcing candidates with more effective, lower cost strategies.

 

Strategy 1: Matching the size of the recruiting team to hiring volume and performance goals

 

Many contact center organizations have been reducing headcount, including human resources and recruiting teams. In doing so, the remaining contact center human resource employees are asked to do more. This often leads to less focus on recruiting and more focus on administrative tasks. Unfortunately, our experience, based on working with some leading contact center recruiting teams, suggests that maintaining a dedicated recruiting team per site actually enables the team to meet fill rates while improving quality of hire. And, the financial benefit of keeping the recruiting team right-sized actually creates a more significant financial payback than the cost reduction in headcount.

 

Data from one organization is depicted in the chart below. The chart illustrates the following between 2005 and 2008 for a multi-site contact center organization hiring thousands of employees each year:
 

·         A ratio of 164 hires per recruiter in 2005 compared to a ratio of 140 hires per recruiter in 2008.

·         Hiring volume more than doubled in 2008 compared to 2005, using 100% as a baseline for hiring volume.

·         Early stage attrition was reduced from 42% in 2005 to 23% in 2008 - a 45% reduction.
 

FurstPerson Hires to Recruiters Ratio Graph


This hiring organization was able to increase the dedicated recruiting team to keep pace with the increase in hiring volume. In fact, the recruiting team actually grew slightly during this time as evidenced by the drop in hires to recruiter ratio between 2005 and 2008. Because the recruiting staff was dedicated and staffed correctly, it was able to focus on attrition reduction efforts, including the use of pre-employment assessment tools. The attrition reduction alone saved this organization over $12 million in turnover related costs which created a payback of over seven times the incremental staff investment.

 

Strategy 2: Using internet sourcing and referral programs to drive recruiting costs down

 

The organization referenced above will help us highlight the second strategy - the effective use of recruiting sources to reduce overall recruiting costs.

 

At FurstPerson, we often classify recruitment marketing into “Tiers” as follows:

Tier 1 – traditional recruiting sources like newspaper and radio ads

Tier 2 – internet based recruiting ranging from job boards to resume bank searching

Tier 3 – direct person to person sourcing like employee referral programs

 

The chart below shows that in 2009 the recruiting cost per hire decreased to 40% of the recruiting cost in 2007. This cost reduction was accomplished by shifting recruitment marketing away from expensive Tier 1 sources to lower cost and more effective Tier 2 and Tier 3 sources. In 2009, for example, Tier 2 sources increased to over 40% of overall candidate volume while Tier 1 sources dropped to about 13% of overall candidate volume. In particular, this organization made effective use of its corporate career webpage which became the second largest internet source replacing Craigslist. This became a low cost, effective source of candidates.


FurstPerson Recruiting Cost Graph

 

Combining these two strategies highlights strategies and tactics that contact centers struggling with frontline agent recruiting may want to consider:

 

·         When it comes to frontline agent hiring, having the right sized recruiting team enables effective use of recruiting tactics. For example, over 40% of candidates come from Tier 3 sources which include employee referral programs. Having the right number of recruiters per site enables this team to effectively run the employee referral programs to create significant candidate volume.

·         Improving quality and driving down costs can take time. In this example, the organization worked over a four year period to reduce attrition and shift costs from high cost recruiting sources to lower cost sources. This only worked because a data-driven approach to the recruiting process linking quality of hire (measured by assessment scores and performance data) to recruiting sources helped the recruiting teams target which sources to eliminate and which to emphasize.

·         Workforce planning is critical to maintaining the right ratio of recruiters to hires. This recruiting organization was able to work with call center workforce planning to forecast increased hiring volume which enabled it to grow the internal recruiting team to effectively maintain its key strategies and tactics.

Myth or Fact? Shorter pre-hire testing time reduces the number of candidates who drop out of the process

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Thursday, November 17, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »
Recently FurstPerson participated in the 2011 Customer Contact West Executive MindXChange hosted by Frost & Sullivan in San Diego, CA.  We led an interactive session, Separating Myth from Fact: Hiring for Peak Performance and Customer Satisfaction, which was the top rated session at the 2011 Customer Contact West event.  We wanted to share some of the content from the session with you via our blog series. 

Last week, we presented data on candidate perception on the assessment experience.  You can...continue reading this post »

Myth or Fact? Applicants generally think it takes them longer to complete pre-hire tests than it does

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Tuesday, November 8, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »
Recently FurstPerson participated in the 2011 Customer Contact West MindXChange hosted by Frost & Sullivan in San Diego, CA.  We led an interactive session, Separating Myth from Fact: Hiring for Peak Performance and Customer Satisfaction, which was the top rated session at the 2011 Customer Contact West event.  We wanted to share some of the content from the session with you via our blog series. 
Myth or Fact?  Applicants generally think it takes them longer to complete pre-hire tests than it...continue reading this post »

Strategies that Separate Myth From Fact in Contact Center Hiring: Build a Data-Driven Model

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Tuesday, October 18, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

Recently at the International Customer Service Association (ICSA) conference in San Antonio, Barbara Morrison, a Human Resources Director for Suddenlink Communications, and Jeff Furst, President and CEO of FurstPerson, presented a case study titled Separating Myth from Fact: Hiring for Peak Performance and Service.  Based on this discussion, FurstPerson has summarized three key strategies that enable contact center hiring managers to separate myth from fact when developing and operating contact...

continue reading this post »

Strategies that Separate Myth From Fact in Contact Center Hiring: Understand and Define the Job

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Friday, October 14, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

Last month at the International Customer Service Association (ICSA) conference in San Antonio, Texas, Barbara Morrison, a Human Resources Director for Suddenlink Communications, and Jeff Furst, President and CEO of FurstPerson, presented a case study titled Separating Myth from Fact: Hiring for Peak Performance and Service.

Based on this discussion, FurstPerson has summarized three key strategies that enable contact center hiring managers to separate myth from fact when developing and operating...

continue reading this post »

The Win-Win-Win of the Home Agent Model

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Friday, August 26, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »
SYKES Home

Listen to Faye Victora, VP of SYKES Home, share her experiences with Jeff Furst on contact center home agent recruiting, compensation, and success factors in the most recent FurstPerson podcast. 

Click here to listen or access the transcript.

Moving Hiring Online - Testing Length and Candidate Completion Rates

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Thursday, June 16, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

The use of web-based pre-hire assessments to help identify quality job candidates has become more and more widespread in recent years across all industries and job types, including contact center agents. Although many contact center recruiters use pre-hire assessments to help identify quality candidates, they sometimes express concerns that the time to complete the assessments may cause candidates to drop out of the assessment process prematurely.  They propose that shortening testing...

continue reading this post »

The Customer Experience Matters. Does Age Play a Part?

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Monday, January 10, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

Our fourth post in Brent Holland's series, “Generational Hiring for the Optimal Customer Experience”, discusses research examining whether generational groups produce a different customer experience.

Do generational differences affect perceptions of the customer experience?

In the last post, I shared research indicating that more mature workers are likely to turnover less often than younger workers.  That’s only half the equation, however.  An equally important issue concerns whether generational...

continue reading this post »

Age Matters When it Comes to Call Center Retention! Generational Hiring for the Optimal Customer Experience, Part 3

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Monday, January 3, 2011   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

The third post in Brent Holland's blog series, “Generational Hiring for the Optimal Customer Experience”, explores whether different generational groups are more likely to stick with a call center job versus leaving early in his/her employment.

Are different generational groups more likely to remain employed in a call center job?

One of the myths that finds its way into many domestic call centers is that more mature workers (chronologically speaking, anyway) will stick with the job through the...

continue reading this post »

Who is a Boomer? Generational Hiring for the Optimal Customer Experience, Part 2

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Tuesday, December 28, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

My colleague, Brent Holland, continues our series on "Generational Hiring for the Optimal Customer Experience".  The second installment considers two important questions:  (1) how to define generational groups and (2) whether contact centers rely on generational groups to guide recruitment.

How does FurstPerson define generational groups for this research?

When we began studying the impact of generational classifications, one of the first things we noticed was that many people disagree on who is a...

continue reading this post »

Generational Hiring for the Optimal Customer Experience, Part 1

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Thursday, November 4, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

Brent Holland, Vice President for Research and Consulting at FurstPerson,  has produced a series of blog posts entitled “Generational Hiring for the Optimal Customer Experience”.  Over the coming weeks, I will present some of his research on generational differences and their impact on call center attrition and performance.

Contact centers today are focused on driving the optimal customer experience.  An often repeated question concerns whether certain generational groups, such as baby boomers,...

continue reading this post »

Social Media and Call Center Recruiting

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Monday, October 11, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

In the world of recruiting, using social media as a recruiting source has become one of the hottest trends lately.  Dr. John Sullivan, writing at ERE.Net, calls social media “the most powerful recruiting tool since the telephone.” 

How viable is social media for volume hiring in the call center? 

Recently, my colleague at FurstPerson, Tim McDaris, a Director at FurstPerson, conducted some high level research to determine candidate views on social media.  FurstPerson asked over 350 contact center...

continue reading this post »

FurstPerson Named Frost & Sullivan’s U.S. Contact Centers' Choice: Best Solution Provider for Agent Life-Cycle HR Software

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Tuesday, September 21, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

FurstPerson has been recognized as the “Best Solution Provider for Agent Life-Cycle HR Software in the United States” among this market segment’s top competitors.  In the recently released industry analyst report 2010 U.S. Contact Center Market: Trends in Contact Center Strategies, Operations, and Technologies, Frost & Sullivan surveyed 311 customer care and contact center operations managers.  FurstPerson emerged as a leader in agent life-cycle HR software, with 63 percent of surveyed U.S....

continue reading this post »

Who Should You Hire? Job Analysis Research Findings on Contact Center Competencies

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Wednesday, August 11, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

Recently FurstPerson conducted research based on job analysis work conducted with contact center organizations.  We blogged (Part I, Part II, and Part III) about this research but have consolidated the blog postings into a white paper.

Based on recent extensive job analysisresearch in the contact center industry, FurstPerson has found that there are common competencies which are often important across all job families and industries.  While it makes sense that some competencies would be critical...

continue reading this post »

CSAT, Net Promoter, and Home Agent Models

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Monday, June 28, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »


Recently, a case study by Customer Relationship Metrics (CRM), an applied Business Intelligence services firm, was published that provided performance data for a firm that took top agents and sent them home. FurstPerson's newest whitepaper on the subject reviews two common home agent models and discusses the case study and its implications to home agent models.

We find that sending successfull on-premise agents into an at-home setting without evaluatingtheir readiness for such an environment is...

continue reading this post »

How Vonage is Increasing Customer Satisfaction by Hiring Better

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Wednesday, May 19, 2010   |   [1] Leave a Comment »
Frost & Sullivan recently hosted an eBroadcast titled “The First Step Toward Improving the Customer Experience: Recruiting and Hiring the Right Agents”.

In Part I, we summarized ideas from Keith Dawson, Frost’s Principal Analyst for Information and Technologies, and his concept of a “blind spot” that many contact center managers have when it comes to understanding the importance of automating their hiring process and its relationship to overall customer satisfaction.

In Part II, Mike Trotter, VP...continue reading this post »

Find and Fix Your Managerial Blind Spot

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Thursday, April 29, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »
Earlier this month, in an eBroadcast coordinated with Frost & Sullivan, Keith Dawson, Frost’s Principal Analyst for Information and Communication Technologies, Mike Trotter, VP of Customer Experience at Vonage, and Jeff Furst, President and CEO of FurstPerson, discussed how leveraging the agent hiring process can lead to improved customer experience results.

In part I today, we’ll highlight Keith Dawson’s comments and analysis. In part II, we’ll provide highlights of the conversation between Mike...continue reading this post »

What Was the Average Cost and Rate of Contact Center Attrition in 2009?

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Wednesday, April 14, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »
In an earlier posting, we revealed information about the top reasons for employee turnover in 2009.  Now we’ll look at another key finding from our 2009 Contact Center Recruiting and Compensation Survey:  the average cost and rate of attrition in 2009.

The average cost of attrition was $4,284.73 in North America (see Table 3), which is roughly a 22% decrease from 2008 figures (Note. The 2008 figures included participants from Manufacturing, which skewed the overall cost.). As expected, the...continue reading this post »

Are You Fast and Accurate? Quality of Hire and Recruiting Speed -- How can you have both?

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Monday, April 12, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »

Recruiting speed and hiring for quality are two of the biggest challenges facing firms that employ contact center agents.  By quality of hire, we mean the organizational standard that defines satisfactory job performance.  By recruiting speed, we mean how fast the hiring process can move a candidate from point of contact to an accepted job offer. 

Though the economic downturn has seen increased unemployment and created more job candidates seeking work, these challenges still remain.  FurstPerson’s...

continue reading this post »

What Were the Top Reasons for Employee Turnover in 2009?

Posted By Jeff Furst   |   Wednesday, April 7, 2010   |   [0] Leave a Comment »
In an earlier posting, we revealed information about the average wages for contact center employees in 2009.  Now we’ll look at another key finding from our 2009 Contact Center Recruiting and Compensation Survey:   the top reasons for employee turnover in 2009.

About 46% of center leaders reported that at least one-half of their monthly attrition is voluntary (see Figure 2). Nearly 34% of respondents reported a voluntary attrition rate below 20%. Compared to 2008 results, 2009 voluntary turnover...continue reading this post »